Why Faking it Leads to Poor ROI
I have been in the journey orchestration industry for several years and every day we have the opportunity to engage with customers to share our experiences, learn from them and explore new possibilities. There is so much learning happening and I am absolutely passionate about this industry and I thought it would be useful to share some of those experiences with my network. The topic I want to start with is a fairly basic one centred around the idea of the difference between real and fake journey orchestration.
Communicating the Differences
We have recently had an experience with a client that is actively using our Journey Orchestration solution. The solution is working incredibly well and we are achieving incredible results. To give you a sense of the ROI, consider the following case studies:
The client is a leading financial service provider and offers truly unique solutions to the market. We have an excellent relationship with them and they are enjoying really great ROI.
Enter the challenge : a provider that claims they can do it for 1/10th of the cost. There is no doubt it can be done more cheaply but will the same ROI be achieved - no it won't! So what is the difference between a solution that sends some messages and one that truly does journey orchestration. It is this dilemma that led me to write this article.
Faking It
Lets consider a scenario of a financial institution wanting to nudge customers along the journey. The diagram below shows how this is possible:
It is true to saying that the above approach will result in:
It is also true to say that the above approach will have a net positive impact and might meet the need of many customers. However, if you really want to get 1000%+ ROIs, you are going to need an alternative approach
Real Customer Journey Orchestration
Lets look at the same scenario with a full blown Journey Orchestration Approach. This looks quite different:
It is supported by rich dialogues - an example is shown below:
There are several components you should demand of anyone claiming to offer a journey orchestration solution:
The above list is not comprehensive, but it is a great starting point for considering the difference between a journey orchestration solution and a solution that messages customers at various points in the customer journey.
Our experience has proven that the comprehensive approach yields multiple the value of a simple messaging solution (and yes, it costs more but the ROI is far far greater).
The area of customer journey orchestration is filled with interesting learnings in a world where marketing comes together with data (and lets not forget AI).
I look forward to sending out a learning on a weekly basis - please reach out and feel free to debate the points - while we have extensive experience, the field is a relatively new one and we are all learning on a daily basis.
Let's enjoy the journey together!
Have a great week
Trent
Subscribed.
The devil is in the detail, not in the customer. Without customised and personalised engagement, journeys are unlikely to foster enduring customer loyalty and retention. Experience during the acquisition phase sets the scene for what follows. Perceptions are harder to change than to form. Genuine interest in customers, their unique preferences, and their particular needs must shine through the interactions and interfaces. “Any colour as long as it’s blue” will not cut it. One size fits all belongs in the past. Fortunately modern technology can enable flexible and responsive automation. Question is whether solutions can keep pace with evolving generations? Perhaps AI, machine learning and intelligence, will help to preserve organisation memory within volatile and erratic organisationsl changes. “The customer is always right – unless they are wrong”.