Customer Capitalism: A Discussion of Purpose, Persistence, and Blind Spots
I recently had an interesting conversation with Peter Crosby for the podcast Unpacking the Digital Shelf.
When Peter asked about the challenges of operating in what seems like a time of chronic crisis, from inflation to supply chain issues, upstart competition, and technology’s ongoing disruptions, my mind turned, naturally, to customer capitalism and purpose. To focus on delighting customers truly is the answer to all those challenges, and as I told Peter, that’s the reason why our book is called Winning on Purpose.
“Without the right purpose you have no chance of enduring success. Ninety percent of businesses today have embraced a purpose that is guaranteed to fail because it’s about something other than putting customers’ interests first. I was shocked. When we asked business leaders around the world what is the primary purpose your organization exists, only 10% said it’s to make our customers’ lives better. When you are in a company where the leadership purpose is off center [like that], you either have to get it on center or go work somewhere else, because it’s not going to lead to victory.”
The problem, I explained, is that many executives don’t realize that their organizations are not customer focused.
“It’s so commonsensical. Most people who will read this book will say we must already be doing this. But they’re not. Ask your coworkers, ask the people on the teams that work for you to read the book, what they see that’s different, and what you’d need to change inside the company to actually live these principles. I think you’ll get some surprises.”
Of course, having a proper purpose isn’t enough. You have to also be persistent. I told Peter about our koi pond at our Cape Cod home.
“I like koi because I think persistence is so vital in everything we do. Koi evolved from fish living in the mouths of freshwater rivers in Asia. The koi had to swim against the current of that river its entire life or else it would be washed out to the saltwater sea and to its death. And so koi is the symbol of persistence in Chinese art. I think it’s a valuable metaphor because the current that exists in every business is created by the need for profits and revenue and financial metrics. You’re pounded with those every day, day in day out. That river flow is powerful. And so if you want to fight against that and not be washed out to your death you have to instill in teams the ability to 24/7 have discussions about principles—delighting customers, progress on those fronts, golden rule principles of enriching lives.”
You can listen to our full conversation here or subscribe wherever you get your podcasts.
I also recently joined my coauthor Darci Darnell and our partner Priscilla Dell’Orto for a webinar on the right way to apply the principles in Winning on Purpose to your business. A recording is available here.
Recommended reading
We know bad profits are immoral and antithetical to the interests of both customers and long-term investors, but a recent Supreme Court decision finds that they are also unconstitutional. In an article in The Boston Globe, “Hidden Terms, High Cancellation Fees, Complex Disclaimers Should Be Forbidden,” Harvard Law School professor and author Cass Sunstein describes the case, which had been brought by employees of Northwestern University. The employees claimed the university had violated its fiduciary obligation, particularly its “duty of prudence,” by offering a dizzying number of retirement plan options (more than 400), that often included complex disclosures and hidden fees. Some of the options were quite bad. Northwestern’s defense was that the employees had choice; there was no obligation to choose a bad plan.
The court ruled that free choice isn’t enough. Those choices must be laid out in a way that is helpful and clear, especially to the most vulnerable. “It is time to recognize a new right,” Sunstein argues, “the right not to be manipulated.”
Good riddance to caveat emptor!
Customer love highlight
My electric shaver stopped working after nine months. I hadn’t kept any receipts or warranty information, but I recalled buying it at Costco. So, I took it back to my Costco warehouse, where the customer service clerk scanned the product number on the bottom of the device and credited back what I had paid, including tax. I asked what the time limit was for returns like this, and she said: “Well, we have time limits for cell phones and some technology items like TVs because some customers were abusing our generous system, but for items like your shaver, there really is no set limit. If the customer is not happy, we trust their judgment and process the return.”
I think this is a wonderful example of the philosophy that companies don’t deserve to earn any profit until the customer is happy.
Winning on Purpose: The Unbeatable Strategy of Loving Customers, is now on sale.
I hope you’re enjoying reading this newsletter as much as I am putting it together. As a big believer in the word-of-mouth recommendation, I hope you’ll consider spreading the word about Customer Obsession by sharing the newsletter’s link with your LinkedIn network.
Thank you,
Fred
I am a Fred Reichheld and NPS fan and agree that short term initiatives that hurt the long-term value of the company are immoral and dumb. That said, I consistently find that a focus on serving customer is key to generating profits. Profitability can guide companies to those products or services that are best suited, where they are most competitive, and consequently most profitable. The Northwestern retirement plan options, particularly those that were not in the best interest of the employees, is an example of bad profits. I am saddened to think a court must intervene to reinforce what both Northwestern and their plan adviser should have known. I doubt Northwestern or the plan provider will be bragging about being reprimanded by the court. All this goes to reinforce what Adam Smith pointed out in 1776 in "Wealth of Nations", that is, free market capitalism is and remains the most moral way mankind has found to run an economy. This Forbes article makes a more current point of the same thing within companies and employees: https://www.forbes.com/sites/fotschcase/2016/05/31/engage-your-employees-in-making-money/ Several case examples are available in my book, "Partners on the Payroll" Thanks Fred...